Skip to content

TRMNL Image Agent Project Analysis

Analysis Date: 2026-01-25 Project: /Users/wschenk/The-Focus-AI/trmnl-image-agentTotal Sessions: 44 Sessions Analyzed: 42

This document was generated using the session management tools to understand what work has been done in the trmnl-image-agent project.

Project Overview

Based on analyzing 42 Claude Code sessions, the trmnl-image-agent project is focused on building an automated dashboard system for TRMNL e-ink displays.

Success Metrics

  • 95.2% Success Rate (40 out of 42 sessions successfully completed)
  • 76% Feature Development (32 feature sessions, 3 bug fixes, 2 refactors)
  • Average Session Duration: 4-5 minutes
  • Total Development Investment: ~$5-10 in Claude API costs (estimated from token usage)

Key Topics & Focus Areas

The analysis revealed these primary focus areas (by session frequency):

  1. TRMNL Display Integration (11 sessions) - Core functionality for pushing images to e-ink displays
  2. Git Workflow Automation (6 sessions) - Automating commits, pushes, and repository updates
  3. Secret Management (5 sessions) - Secure handling of API keys and credentials
  4. Weather & Ski Data Integration (4 sessions) - Fetching real-time weather and mountain conditions
  5. Dashboard Image Generation (3 sessions) - AI-powered image creation for displays

Emerging Patterns

The session topics show a clear progression:

  1. Phase 1: Setting up TRMNL integration and environment
  2. Phase 2: Building data fetching (weather, ski conditions)
  3. Phase 3: AI image generation with Gemini
  4. Phase 4: Automation and workflow optimization

Technology Stack

Based on tool usage analysis across all sessions:

Tool/TechnologyUsage RateSessions
TRMNL API71.4%30
nano-banana (Gemini CLI)31.0%13
Git23.8%10
1Password CLI16.7%7
ImageMagick14.3%6
Gemini API14.3%6
chrome-driver11.9%5
Weather APIs7.1%3

Primary Languages: Bash (45%), Markdown (48%), YAML (14%)

Key Technical Learnings

The LLM analysis extracted these critical insights from the sessions:

Image Optimization for E-ink

"TRMNL displays require specific image constraints including 800x480 resolution, 2-bit color depth, and a file size limit under 90KB. Achieving these constraints for complex woodcut-style images requires aggressive compression tools like pngquant and precise palette management."

Impact: This became a recurring challenge solved through iterative optimization.

Workflow Integration

"Programmatic image generation can be integrated into workflows using CLI tools like nano-banana with Gemini models. E-ink displays like TRMNL require specific image optimizations, such as 1-bit conversion and strict file size limits (under 90KB), to function correctly."

Impact: Established the core automation pipeline architecture.

Parallel Data Fetching

"Parallel data fetching for weather and mountain conditions optimizes the dashboard generation workflow, and integrating real-time alerts like Winter Storm Warnings provides critical context for automated displays."

Impact: Performance optimization that improved dashboard update speed.

Recent Activity (Last 24 Hours)

Most Recent Session (3 hours ago)

  • Task: Update image and push to display, then commit and push
  • Duration: 4m 30s
  • Tool Calls: 35
  • Cost: $0.90
  • Outcome: ✅ Success

The project shows consistent daily activity with automated dashboard updates.

Search Examples

Here are some useful searches you can run on this project:

Find Image Optimization Solutions

bash
dotenvx run -- pnpm run cli sessions search "image optimization" \
  --tags e-ink,trmnl \
  --project /Users/wschenk/The-Focus-AI/trmnl-image-agent

Find Automation Workflows

bash
dotenvx run -- pnpm run cli sessions search "automation" \
  --success yes \
  --project /Users/wschenk/The-Focus-AI/trmnl-image-agent
bash
dotenvx run -- pnpm run cli sessions search "git" \
  --type feature \
  --project /Users/wschenk/The-Focus-AI/trmnl-image-agent

Project Health Indicators

Strengths:

  • Very high success rate (95.2%)
  • Focused feature development (32 features vs 3 bugs)
  • Consistent daily activity
  • Well-integrated tool ecosystem
  • Clear technical documentation in learnings

⚠️ Areas of Iteration:

  • Image size optimization required multiple sessions to perfect
  • Secret management went through several refinement cycles
  • E-ink display constraints needed iterative problem-solving

Insights for Future Work

Based on pattern analysis:

  1. Image optimization is costly - Multiple sessions were needed to get the 90KB limit right. Consider creating a reusable optimization script early in similar projects.

  2. Automation pays off - Git workflow automation (23.8% of sessions) streamlined later work significantly.

  3. Secret management is critical - 16.7% of sessions involved 1Password integration, showing the importance of secure credential handling from the start.

  4. AI image generation works well - nano-banana + Gemini integration was successful with minimal iteration needed.

Recommendations

For similar e-ink display projects:

  1. Start with constraints - Document display resolution, color depth, and file size limits upfront
  2. Automate early - Git workflows and deployment scripts pay dividends quickly
  3. Parallel data fetching - Fetch multiple data sources concurrently for better performance
  4. Secure from day one - Use 1Password CLI or similar for API key management
  5. Iterate on optimization - E-ink image optimization requires experimentation; budget time for it

Conclusion

The trmnl-image-agent project demonstrates effective use of Claude Code for building an automated dashboard system. The high success rate and focused feature development show good problem decomposition and iterative refinement.

Key Achievement: Successfully integrated AI image generation, weather data fetching, and hardware deployment into a fully automated pipeline.


This analysis was generated using the umwelten session management tools. For details on how to perform similar analysis on your projects, see Session Analysis Walkthrough.

Released under the MIT License.